|
|
#15847 - 10/09/01 12:01 PM
Re: Staff Grading
|
Philosopher
Registered: 11/07/00
Posts: 970
Loc: Stockport, Cheshire, England
|
This was thrashed around a couple of weeks ago somewhere else on the Forum - but I can't remember where ! Probably one of those strings which "wandered" off the topic ! There are lots of problems with the grades ;- 1) they start at a ridiculously low level (who would want to start someone on MTO1 unless they were just an EBME Porter ?) 2) They are too short and there isn't enough discretion to allow you to reward good people. 3) There aren't enough usable grades (ignoring MTO1 & 2 as being an insult to offer anyone) 4) An MTO6 (or even a 7) would be nice ! Dream On ! :rolleyes:
_________________________
Today is the day you worried about yesterday - and all is well !
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#15848 - 10/09/01 02:58 PM
Re: Staff Grading
|
Hero
Registered: 03/07/00
Posts: 1583
Loc: UK
|
Roy I totally agree, but surely MTO1 - 5 would be fine if they were about 5K more on each level (and 10K on an MTO5 to allow for the stresses of management) 
_________________________
Be Proactive and reactive.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#15849 - 10/09/01 04:22 PM
Re: Staff Grading
|
Philosopher
Registered: 11/07/00
Posts: 970
Loc: Stockport, Cheshire, England
|
Only 5K ? I was hoping for more like 10 ! 
_________________________
Today is the day you worried about yesterday - and all is well !
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#15855 - 10/09/01 10:40 PM
Re: Staff Grading
|
Hero
Registered: 03/07/00
Posts: 1583
Loc: UK
|
Tony You know me, work, work, work, no rest for the wicked! 
_________________________
Be Proactive and reactive.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 Registered (bcarlisle, bill_mcg, biomedbill, Blondie, BobA, Ciaran McGuinness, Dicky, DJIELA, Eddie, Geoff Hannis, Graham Roberts, Huw, Ivor D., JB, Joe Emmerson, John Stewart, JoLee, Ken, KevByard, KM, Laiq, Lee S, Marcel Eve, Matt Castledine, Panander, Paul Allum, pef6, PeteD, Prathapankp, redSG, Robert134, RoJo, Scott Barlow, StuB, SUZUKI, terry horton),
and 87 guests online.
|
|
|