Home | Articles | Products | Services | Jobs | Forum | Downloads | Press | Contact Us

Page 6 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#50455 - 21/11/10 12:33 PM Re: occupational standards [Re: Chris Watts]
Geoff Hannis Offline
Super Hero

Registered: 12/02/04
Posts: 10279
Loc: the path less trodden

By no means perfect, perhaps ... but why "disastrous"?

What "incentives" were in place before for GP's et al to have their kit checked occasionally?

And who (apart from the "tick-box companies") is supposed to check the kit? Don’t tell me that NHS biomed sheds have the time and/or resources (or indeed, the inclination) to do that!

An opportunity arose, and the Private Sector stepped up to the mark to fullfil the requirement. What's the problem? We're not taking about ICU's and Operating Theatres and such here, after all. smile

Top
#50456 - 21/11/10 01:02 PM Re: occupational standards [Re: rob]
Chris Watts Offline
Sage

Registered: 21/12/04
Posts: 449
Loc: UHBristol
Well Geoff it all depends on perspective, but just from the wikipedia article the government expected GP's to only reach 70% of the QOF points in the first year but instead they got 90% without much indication of improvement. It is thus one of the reasons some GP's got big salary increases.

It's also the reason your GP surgery is probably now closed out of hours and passed on to a out of hours service. Where in one case a German doctor gave someone a overdose.

It also targets particular medical conditions which means if your a GP who's practice is located in an area with immigrants coming in with diseases no longer seen in the UK, your basically screwed.

As for who's supposed to check the kit, there's still quality companies out there and some NHS departments do cover an area instead of just a hospital. With a lack of specification for the level of service both will just have to either drop their standards or promote their quality.


Top
#50457 - 21/11/10 01:09 PM Re: occupational standards [Re: Chris Watts]
Geoff Hannis Offline
Super Hero

Registered: 12/02/04
Posts: 10279
Loc: the path less trodden

Sorry Mate ... I don't make Government Policy. That's way above my pay grade, I'm afraid. frown

Top
#50584 - 25/11/10 07:49 PM Re: occupational standards [Re: rob]
Fordy Offline
Scholar

Registered: 07/09/05
Posts: 53
Loc: United Kingdom
Geoff,

Interest in your comment referring to practical hands on training. Apart from the electrical safety testing, what would be your key equipment areas where current practical skills training are lacking?

Top
#50586 - 25/11/10 08:31 PM Re: occupational standards [Re: Fordy]
Geoff Hannis Offline
Super Hero

Registered: 12/02/04
Posts: 10279
Loc: the path less trodden

The simple answer is that it would depend upon the student(s). I am imagining blokes from overseas, after all.

To my mind there is no big deal about electrical safety. It is part of the ethos, but is by no means the "be all and end all" of biomed. I'm far more interested in what we might call "personal qualities".

But as an aid to understanding, I would be also like to see blokes carry out EST without an Electrical Safety Tester! smile

Top
#50657 - 28/11/10 09:49 PM Re: occupational standards [Re: rob]
Fordy Offline
Scholar

Registered: 07/09/05
Posts: 53
Loc: United Kingdom
Mmm - some defining start standard - may be tricky with overseas students,
Personal Qualities - integrity, self discipline and technical expertise/talent, spring to mind...
then... practical all the way, (megga and avo perhaps!!)

Top
#50662 - 29/11/10 08:27 AM Re: occupational standards [Re: Fordy]
Geoff Hannis Offline
Super Hero

Registered: 12/02/04
Posts: 10279
Loc: the path less trodden

When did you last crank a Megger then, Fordy? whistle

Not tricky. I reckon I can suss out a tech in under five minutes!

But about the Personal Qualities:- yes, yes, yes ... plus my usual favourite - willingness to work. smile

Top
#50683 - 29/11/10 08:24 PM Re: occupational standards [Re: rob]
Fordy Offline
Scholar

Registered: 07/09/05
Posts: 53
Loc: United Kingdom
...now let me think, twice the working voltage springs to mind and it would be around the early 90s doing ignition leads!!

That was in my earlier days as an electrician before I retraded.

Top
Page 6 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6



Moderator:  DaveC in Oz, KM, RoJo 
Sponsors
Press Releases
Who's Online
9 registered (Nozza, DaveC in Oz, Chris Glass, Mofe, Huw, kmadhavesh, Ed SWM, Pete B, READ), 303 Guests and 11 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31