The first and most important step in Job Evaluation as explained by our ex AFC Project Manager at the time is to match the post to the most relevant Job Statement, this overides everything else, even the Factors. This is what got all our initially low bandings corrected along with regional comparisons revealing we were below par despite being a uniquely specialized department as far as Technicians go. Topper
Assuming that under AfC you had straight assimilation across that would put you on Band 5 at pay Point 23 (£21,044). For 08/09 you would normally have progressed to Pay Point 27 (£28,141 with the 2.75% uplift), but this is above the top of Band 5 which stops at Pay Point 25 (£26,123).
_________________________
Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own.
Actually you would only progress to point 26 by now - 23 on 1/10/04 - 24 on 1/10/05 - 25 on 1/10/06 and 26 on 1/10/07
although on another point since you got an MTO 2-3 appeal through you would get a new incremental date of whenever you started the appeal. So assuming that was March 04 then you would receive AFC increments in March rather than October and so would now be on point 27
EDIT Just checked with the T&C handbook and 20,474 would put you across onto point 22 the top transitional point on band 6 paying £20,778 at the time. Applying this to the above means you should now be on point 25 (or 26 with increment in March)
#31640 - 27/06/0806:47 PMRe: Nearly a year
[Re: biomedbill]
Chris Watts
Sage
Registered: 21/12/04
Posts: 449
Loc: UHBristol
Yes, looking at it again the previously stated £21,044 for band 5 (or 20,778 for band 6) in Oct 2004 wasn't point 23 but 22. So that would make it 25 and 26 the coming incremental date.
If Kaiser wants to check they could always work it out from the payscales in Annex B of the Terms and conditions of service handbook