#45719 - 30/04/10 06:11 PM
Re: Difficulties employing biomeds
[Re: rob]
|
Super Hero
Registered: 12/02/04
Posts: 10021
Loc: the path less trodden
|
When it comes to attracting (what you may consider to be) the right sort of people, two more approaches (or business models) come to mind. These are workers co-operatives, and offering equity in the company. I have never come across a co-operative of biomeds myself (else I would have probably joined it), but I did once work for a bloke who granted an increased share in the company year on year. Foolishly perhaps I didn't stick around long enough to see any benefit from that, but that (as they say) is another story. In more recent years, guys I have worked for felt unable to even let me buy into the company, let alone grant a share as part of the "package". I understood their reasons (think ego) but still believe that it actually showed an element of short-sightedness on their behalf. That's just my take on things. But if I started my own biomed venture now (which, I might add, is extremely unlikely), I would set it up as a co-operative of like-minded techs. You know, the B-Team ... the Band of Brothers. Unus pro omnibus, omnes pro uno, and all that good stuff. I believe that approaches like that not only demonstrate total trust, and also move away from the employer-employee relationship, but gives extra incentive to the (shall we say) veteran (experienced, older) guy. ... OK Rob, you've got some feedback. When shall we be hearing from you again? 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#45732 - 01/05/10 04:48 PM
Re: Difficulties employing biomeds
[Re: rob]
|
Super Hero
Registered: 12/02/04
Posts: 10021
Loc: the path less trodden
|
Yes, Rob ... you'll have no difficulty at all soon ... they'll all be beating a path to your door when it becomes, shall we say, a buyers' market. Meanwhile, those "third party" companies may (or may not be) gearing up, as you suggest. But I still reckon that collaboration, rather than out-and-out competition will become the order of the day if we are to stand a chance against the well-known "big player". Remember "SWOT Analysis"? Well, there are strengths and weaknesses in all those little ISO gangs. But with co-operation, all the bases can be covered, straight off the bat. Think "joint ventures" (a contract bidding technique that was often used, with success, out in the Middle East, for instance).  Not so sure about the landslide, by the way. But change for sure (and badly needed too). But we'll all be the wiser in a week's time ... when the real horse trading commences, and the full extent of our dire predicament becomes clear(er). 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46421 - 27/05/10 01:52 PM
Re: Difficulties employing biomeds
[Re: Tony Dowman]
|
Super Hero
Registered: 12/02/04
Posts: 10021
Loc: the path less trodden
|
Give it a bit more time, Mate. Meanwhile, and on the other hand, it’s not at all easy to orchestratre a small team of talented people, whilst keeping everyone happily involved, included, motivated ... and all the rest. In short, singing from the same hymn sheet. The other thing about having a "team of all the talents" ( aka, the B-Team) is that so-called Genius Guys have been known to loose interest in the more trivial aspects of the work ... ergo, there always needs to be a reliable pipe-smoker pottering about at the back of the workshop to take care of the actual work. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46442 - 27/05/10 05:10 PM
Re: Difficulties employing biomeds
[Re: biomedbill]
|
Master
Registered: 16/08/07
Posts: 280
Loc: carlisle uk
|
Have to disagree with the analysis of the NHS wages against Private on page 2.
You get EBME techs from band 4 to band 7 in exceptional circumstances. Usual band 5/6 which is 21K to 34K. Still cheaper than service contracts it has to added.
The real problem is snobbery creeping in with this VRCT Registration and TECHNOLOGIST bull. Also the need for a degree??, started with an HNC from a forces background myself.
As someone has put already it is down to personnel circumstances and job security. If you offer someone a 3 year contract at decent wages with perks you may get people to leave the NHS.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#46512 - 30/05/10 09:12 AM
Re: Difficulties employing biomeds
[Re: Geoff Hannis]
|
Super Hero
Registered: 12/02/04
Posts: 10021
Loc: the path less trodden
|
Meanwhile (and if I may be forgiven for quoting from my own post):- Myself, the only thing I sell is service. And the honest "kit fixer" will always be in demand ... And as if to emphasis and reinforce what I've said there, I continue to seek good hands-on techs of suitable calibre. Specifically, two primarily workshop based in the West of England, one in the East of England (again, workshop based) and a couple of others based in the North East and North West, in a mobile (service engineer) role. We're talking about good all-rounders, working mainly on used equipment. That is, actually fixing kit! One or two of the positions could include an element of what we might call "sales engineer" work (and I only mention that here in case anyone is attracted to that sort of thing). Never a dull day, and a chance to make your contribution felt in a small B-Team environment! Whether it be as a proverbial pipe-smoker, or as a (thrusting?) fertile young mind! 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 registered (Sandy King, mugtree, Huw, zilog, zedrok, SUZUKI, Chris Jones, Darth Welder, jackwu, Stephen Don, BobBanks, obiwan, lesh, RS, Hulk, walaa, Gordovan, Bala Vignesh, John Stewart, Armenag, ipetev, Rob1234, 1 invisible),
370
Guests and
12
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|