|
|
#10691 - 18/09/06 04:42 PM
Re: Use of vehicles
|
Scholar
Registered: 03/05/02
Posts: 70
Loc: York District Hospital
|
Our renal tech's qualify for regular user payments as they do a higher mileage visiting home patients and two satellite units. We all have to pay for parking but can reclaim the cost on days we use our cars for work.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#10692 - 20/09/06 03:19 PM
Re: Use of vehicles
|
Newbie
Registered: 20/09/06
Posts: 1
Loc: Middlesbrough
|
Does anyone have a situation where they are required to own a car for their job as a med tech, is a trust able to force you to buy a car to keep your job?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#26277 - 22/10/07 10:24 AM
Re: Use of vehicles
[Re: BSM]
|
Mentor
Registered: 22/07/05
Posts: 185
Loc: south yorkshire
|
Most contracts only require that you have a "clean" driving licence. We stopped using our cars for work when the trust brought in car parking charges (£0 to £260 overnight). We couldn't get any reduction for using our own vehicles. The management checked our contracts and sure enough it is not part of our terms and conditions. Our renal techs have lease cars, they have a lot of patients in the community and satellite units to visit, even they couldn't get a reduced parking permit. The renal guys now do the external jobs that we used to do. We have had to find a way to fund their parking permits from our budget.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#26328 - 25/10/07 03:42 PM
Re: Use of vehicles
[Re: Dom Nicosia]
|
Novice
Registered: 28/07/04
Posts: 14
Loc: u.k.
|
Where I work we have a fleet of vans for travelling to other sites. Presumably this works out cheaper for the hospital than paying mileage for the use of technicians' own cars, which I find very strange, especially given that the mileage rate is a lot lower today, in real terms, than it was fifteen or so years ago.
But before it was decided to lease these vans we did use our own cars, and it was certainly true that a car and licence were considered to be of far greater importance than formal qualifications to do the job. If you refused to use your car, a van was not provided as an alternative, you lost responsibility for any equipment off site, and consequently you were in effect demoted, or at least denied the opportunity for career development. On the other hand, trainees with cars and licences, who were taking day-release HNCs, failed these courses yet were immediately promoted to fill the void left by the qualified, experienced person without transport. It seems to me that for all the person specifications which accompany our jobs, all the NHS is really interested in is a man-and-a-van.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 Registered (abi, Ali-G., Baldrick, bill_mcg, biomedbill, Blinkin Flip, BobA, Dicky, Ed SWM, Eddie, Gav, Geoff Hannis, Gerry, Graham Roberts, Huw, John Stewart, JoLee, Jonathan Wells, Kawasaki, keano, Ken, KM, Laiq, Panander, Paul Latham, ray hill, RoJo, seppy, SUZUKI, Tony Dowman, TonyR),
and 111 guests online.
|
|
|