Sponsors
Top Posters
(Last 30 Days)
409
Eddie
327
Geoff Hannis
62
Huw
38
Lee S
29
TheWoo
22
Naitch
21
RoJo
20
Fordy
20
Kawasaki
19
DanKel
19
JoLee
18
D.O.A
Press Releases
Rigel Medical - New MED-eBASE For Medical Equipment Test Records
14 May 2008

Philips Introduces New Fetal-Maternal Monitors with Optional External Touch-Screen Display.
13 May 2008

Philips Introduces A First-Of-Its Kind Multi-Measurement Module
12 May 2008

Philips Healthcare’s Online Store Now Up and Running
12 May 2008

Welch Allyn Launches New Digital MacroViewTM Otoscope
8 May 2008

Monitor, Review and Compare Results with the Welch Allyn CardioPerfect Range
3 May 2008

New Henleys catalogue available.
1 May 2008

TSI Open New European Service Center in UK
21 April 2008

Jacksons Medical Auctions
18 April 2008

Only Two Weeks Remain to Enter Welch Allyn Clinical Engineering Team of the Year Award
17 April 2008

NHS Orders
nhs purchase orders
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Page 2 of 17 <12345>Last »
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#17233 - 26/07/05 01:13 PM Re: Disclosing AFC results
KM Offline
Sage


Registered: 30/08/01
Posts: 517
Loc: CTC
Roy,
When you say your team leader / workshop supervisor / deputy department manager is being re-evaluated do you mean they have gone to an A4C appeal panel. We have been told this is the only mechanism for such activity.

Top
#17234 - 26/07/05 04:13 PM Re: Disclosing AFC results
Eddie Whelan Offline
Visionary


Registered: 04/12/03
Posts: 33
Loc: Dept. of Clinical Engineering ...
:boggle: Hi people :boggle: .

My MTOs are about to be assimilated on the AfC grades. Although I don't have the official confirmation, I have all JDs, person specs. and effort proformas' (if that's how you spell it!).

I attended the 6 day ( :ninja: "judging, sentencing and hanging" :ninja: ) AfC training course, so I could write their paper work. As you all know, "the devil is in the detail"

The regrades should (will) be:

2 x Electronic MTO2's (both got HNC, 4 & 6yrs experience) = Specialist (band 6),
1 x Elec./ Mech. MTO3 (top scale, no stars, 12yrs experience) = Specialist (band 6),
2 x Electronic MTO3s (top of scale, no stars, 1 with HNC, 8yrs experience; the other a degree 15yrs experience) = Section Manager (band 7),
2 x "newbees - MTO2s/ apprentices" (being advertised, entry level - band 4).

If you need copies of paper work, e-mail me on Edward.Whelan@Whittington.nhs.uk.

Top
#17235 - 26/07/05 04:45 PM Re: Disclosing AFC results
Anonymous
Unregistered



I have seen the application pack including job specification and job descriptions for 2? posts that you have going in Medical Engineering at the moment Eddie (I think it's your place anyhow). I assume you were involved in writing them - they're very impressive indeed. I have no doubt that, as you say, the devil's in the detail! Well done. Puts the efforts of some to shame in my opinion.
Top
#17236 - 26/07/05 06:09 PM Re: Disclosing AFC results
Eddie Whelan Offline
Visionary


Registered: 04/12/03
Posts: 33
Loc: Dept. of Clinical Engineering ...
Hello Richard. \:\) Thanks for the compliment \:\) .

I realised early on that many people would be placed on a lower scale if they didn't fit the profiles (i.e. they will be screwed by their Trusts, because MTOs/ Clinical Scientists "generally" do not play the management game \:\( !). Thus, I was one of the first to volunteer to be trained for panels in AfC in my Trust ( you can't play chess, without all the pieces!). So about a two years ago, I told my MTOs what to do, what to say, whom to say it too and what Trust committees to crash in on (some MTOs liked it, some REALY didn't!). I told them it would be financially rewarding in the future. If we didn't plan, they could continue to be excellent techs. on the same pay scale (or lower) for ever, and ever, and ever!!

This enable me to plan their JDs (+ other paper work), which in turn increased their profiles in our Trust. Just apply the principles of evolution, "adaptation :boggle: usually wins". The way I see it is: committees run the NHS, so don't just get involved - take them over and become the key to their success!

MTOs have a wealth of "black box" knowledge (i.e. they know what hospital equipment/ systems connect to other equipment/ systems). That in its self is worth £1,000s to external companies. All EBME depts. should be controlling what equipment comes into their Trusts via their committees - the real key is to identify the dipensers of the capital/ revenue monies and approach them with your ideas (!!Capital Monitoring Group!!).

All of the above increases AfC grading across my dept .

 Quote:
I just love these gremlins!

Top
#17237 - 27/07/05 08:44 AM Re: Disclosing AFC results
MARTIN MORRISON Offline
Novice


Registered: 23/08/04
Posts: 15
Loc: ALTNAGELVIN HOSPITAL
Hi all,
I'm wondering do any of you guy's have equipment librarians within your departments and how have they done with afc?

Top
#17238 - 27/07/05 08:51 AM Re: Disclosing AFC results
Bioman Offline
Sage


Registered: 19/02/03
Posts: 358
Loc: UK
The four people who run our Equipment Library have gone the JAQ route after getting a non match.
Top
#17239 - 27/07/05 09:13 AM Re: Disclosing AFC results
Stew Offline
Visionary


Registered: 21/05/04
Posts: 38
Hi Tracy. Congratulations on your re-grading, unfortunately we are not having such a good time with AFC and are currently going through a re-match to improve on our current Band 4 outcome! Would it be possible for you to e-mail me a copy of your JD to assist us in not getting further screwed!!! ( By the way, we are currently MTO3 +3stars).

Cheers.

Top
#17240 - 27/07/05 09:20 AM Re: Disclosing AFC results
Stew Offline
Visionary


Registered: 21/05/04
Posts: 38
Oops, you might need to have my e-mail address to contact me! Stewart.Metcalf@chs.northy.nhs.uk
Top
#17241 - 27/07/05 11:03 AM Re: Disclosing AFC results
les Offline
Newbie


Registered: 01/11/03
Posts: 5
Loc: hartlepool
Hi Tracy,
Ref previous reply, there was a mistake in e mail address, please send a copy of your JD to dave.brough@nth.nhs.uk

Regards Dave

Top
#17242 - 27/07/05 11:38 AM Re: Disclosing AFC results
C2VTR Offline
Novice


Registered: 17/11/04
Posts: 16
Loc: NWUK
Hi all

Congratulations Tracy on your A4C banding. Just wondering how you were matched to a Specialist Physiological Measurement profile rather than the Medical Engineering Technician Specialist. Do you carry out physiological measurment in your role?

Also, as we suspected all along, there is a growing disparity in banding as the process continues.

Eddie = MTO3 = Band7
Glyn = MTO3 = Band5
Stew = MTO3*3 = Band4

All of this is down to how well a manager interpreted the requirements of a profile and worded a local job description. (Not a very precise methodology, even with your agreement).

Does anyone know if these massive variations will be addressed nationally by the Core Review Group?

Anyway, probably too late now, but good luck everyone.

Paul

Top
Page 2 of 17 <12345>Last »


Hop to:
Who's Online
9 registered (Geoff Hannis, Huw, Eddie, Ed SWM, Chris Watts, Darth Welder, Mark Radbourne, Rob1234, roman kasirye) and 263 anonymous users online.
Newest Members
Thiam, Roger, 1548, marcel, ali abbas
3825 Registered Users
Jobs
Field Service Engineers - London and the South East
-- 16 May 2008

2 Medical Field Service Engineers :: Kent / Essex
-- 8 May 2008

MES Engineer
-- 29 April 2008

Technical Support Engineer
-- 19 March 2008

Newsletter

Subscribe
Unsubscribe