|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
#25718 - 03/10/07 11:39 PM
Re: Transitional points problem!!
[Re: JohnBhoy]
|
Geoff Hannis
Hero
Registered: 12/02/04
Posts: 3044
Loc: the path less trodden
|
No, I wasn't implying what you imply, John. It was only a means of referring to who I'll now have to refer to as the bloke. But, seeing as you've brought it up, the three years would be a factor, I should imagine.
On the issue of biomed departments (and not really on topic, but never mind), my quick response would be:- define "fail". How bad do things have to be before someone steps-in, as it were? In my own travels around the back corridors and Portakabins, I've coming across some pretty appalling set-ups. Perhaps I've just been unlucky?
But I'll bow here to your more informed opinion. Efficient, well-run departments should have nothing to fear.
Cavalier? More of a Roundhead, I would have thought. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#25721 - 04/10/07 12:41 AM
Re: Transitional points problem!!
[Re: JohnBhoy]
|
Darren Magee
Savant
Registered: 18/09/03
Posts: 119
Loc: Key Health Solutions Ltd
|
Somehow I imagined a keen as mustard guy doing the right thing, getting a bad deal for his efforts and felt sympathy for his situation, it appears this chap may just want a peaceful life until retirement, does your colleague deserve a pay rise ?
There are many out there as old or older than this guy I would emlpoy without hesitation, I have recently taken on guys the wrong side of fifty, despite their age, these guys have more energy, drive and ambition than you can imagine, not to mention a heap of common sense and a range of social skills missing from some of our younger generation, they are worth every penny !
Their attitude and efforts justify a greatly enhanced employment package, their professional and personal circumstances have improved out of all recognition, they are valued, contribute and are happy, It is my responsibility to make sure this is the case.
So, although my comments appear less constructive on face value, if youre made of the right stuff and are hitting a brick wall, leaving should not be treated as a last resort but a priority.
Darren
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#25730 - 04/10/07 01:09 PM
Re: Transitional points problem!!
[Re: Dicky]
|
Geoff Hannis
Hero
Registered: 12/02/04
Posts: 3044
Loc: the path less trodden
|
No doubt the bloke has seen the comments his predicament has generated, Dicky. Perhaps he prefers not to come forward. That's fair enough. What do you think this is, Mate ... a Kangaroo Court?
Edited by Geoff Hannis (04/10/07 01:11 PM)
Edit Reason: 3Fh
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#25732 - 04/10/07 01:25 PM
Re: Transitional points problem!!
[Re: Geoff Hannis]
|
SLR
Novice
Registered: 15/07/07
Posts: 13
Loc: North
|
The tech in question started in ebme in sept 04 (just before the afc start date). He knew that with the experience he had that he was on the correct grade, the issue is that he was put on the bottom of the transitional points which are now being abolished and that the new starter we are employing (0 years experience) will be on the same money!!! (seems very unfair to me)
I posted this to see if anyone else out there knew of anyone in similar circumstances, ebme or other hospital staff, and what if anything they are doing about it!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#25733 - 04/10/07 01:29 PM
Re: Transitional points problem!!
[Re: SLR]
|
SLR
Novice
Registered: 15/07/07
Posts: 13
Loc: North
|
ps. thanks for the very positive comments scottish, i'm sure he'll appreciate them!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
