t all sounds very comprehensive and flexible, Jandré.
I hear what your'e saying about possible OEM objections, but will sites be able to swap and compare their home-grown task lists (and what format would they need to be in)?
You need to see the online webinar to see how easy this is.. No use to try and persuade you on a forum unless you see it for yourself.,
Yes; collaboration is good, and feedback from live data situations is always useful. A User Group (or forum) is also something nice to have (but, of course, someone has to maintain - or manage - that as well). "Two heads (or more) are better than one", and all that good stuff. That is the truth..
Trouble is, these days (unless I am misinformed) many of our younger brethren expect software to do all they want "straight out of the box", whilst seemingly fewer and fewer feel inclined to "muck in" themselves. This is exactly the package and they step off with a compliant system if they want..
How many takers (collaborative sites) have rocked up so far, Jandré? From this forum?
No one.. From the United States a few and from the far east a few.. and from Africa there is a lot of interest to the degree that we have to filter participants..
But we have yet to land a colaboration from this platform....
One of our collaboration partners that are really interested includes a Uni in Quebec,,,
But the feelers are still out there to make it more palatable for the rest of the fraternity..