Hello Stephen,
Thermometers all measure temperature, but if you do not standardise across the Trust there are both clinical and cost implications. The best thing you could do as part of your research is to get actual comparisons:
i.e. What do the nurses use as temperature guidelines? Most hospitals don't have any.
At what temperature do the the clinicians say the patient is pyrexic? (The temperature of the body at which the clinician see the temp as a symptom of infection) Most NHS hospitals will rely on the clinician to know - do they?.
If you use multiple models of thermometer - are the clinical staff aware that each thermometer may give a different indication with up to 2 degrees difference. This may affect whether a patient is discharged/or moved to a lower dependancy bed.
How much do your consumables cost? Consumable costs can easily be £50K for a district general, but switching to a surface scan thermometer does cost money initially. You get the money back after ther second year, but saving of £250K to £500K are feasible over the life of the devices.
Can the infection control team give any real evidence that using surface scan thermometers present any more of an infection risk than ear thermometers? Not in my experience. There is a cost to cleaning the thermometers - alcohol wipes (sterets) cost something.
What about looking at patient comfort?
What about theft? I know that when you buy thermometers that do not require consumables they are far more attractive to thieves, and you need to ensure that the stolen themometers are replaced. i.e. this is a cost implication, whereas i know that Welch Allyn will replace their thermometers free of charge, but you have to pay for consubles.
An interesting project to deal with with many avenues of investigation. I hope my comments have given you some 'food for thought'