Home Articles Downloads Forum Products Services EBME Expo Contact
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#77594 17/11/23 2:30 PM
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 12
Novice
OP Offline
Novice
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 12
Hi guys. Hope all are well. Could i ask what the procedures are for CPAP servicing . Historically, we have commisioned them up, tested them and out a 5 year sticker on them. Resmed say they have a 6 year life at 12 hours per day and then they should dispose of them. Our cardio-resp department are telling us that resmed have said they do not need testing and can be issued straight from dept out of the box. If this is the case, they have suggested that they do not need to come via MES or be added to the register. Any comments greatly received, thanks in advance

Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 127
Likes: 24
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 127
Likes: 24
At another Trust we would simply perform a visual inspection and EST. Its a class 2 device so low risk in a lot of ways. If you want to performance test them then chances are your walk in clinic will get annoyed as you'll need to run them over a period of time and the patient will have to sit and wait longer than normal. Get the reps version in writing, check the manual recommendation and create the PPM. You'll need them on a register for warranty and financial reasons as part of a hospital inventory at the least. Also good for when they recall the devices or issue field safety notice and you need to cross reference serial numbers. The recent Philips/Respronics recall and removal of their ventilator/CPAP products is a great example for this.


30 years since the Chernobyl disaster and yet we still have no super heroes or zombies.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,638
Likes: 60
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,638
Likes: 60
Hospital (Trust) equipment Policies shall over-rule any "local" policies (the "cardio-resp" department in this case).

As mentioned on an earlier thread, kit like this should be given the "once over" (inspection for damage, at least) by a tech every time it appears on site ("walk-in clinic" or whatever). Also, both staff and patients must be encouraged (prevailed upon) to report faults. After all, the kit does not belong to them (neither the patients or the staff).

In my opinion, not having everything on the database (register) sounds like the slippery slope to negligence. What's it to be next ... what other equipment is to be disregarded in this way ... where do we draw the line?

As Dustcap mentions, all items of powered medical equipment should appear on the PM schedule, even if the inspection interval is "every five years" (I would max-out at one year, myself).

And yes, when (and wherever) "difficulties" are encountered, get those resisting to set down their objections in writing.

In passing, I have always advocated that all items belonging to each Hospital should be accounted for; biomed kit on the CMMS database, Estates stuff on whatever system they use (remember WIMS, anyone?) ... and all other property (chairs, et al) under Property Control.


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.

Moderated by  DaveC in Oz, RoJo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 190 guests, and 136 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
lauru2017, Banti, Mlqg_Bkdn, W.S., Joseph28
10,152 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums25
Topics11,026
Posts73,582
Members10,152
Most Online5,980
Jan 29th, 2020
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5