|
|
If a specific post was interesting or useful to you, we recommend that you Like that post. It tells the post author, and others, that you found the information valuable. Clicking Like is another way to let others know that you enjoy it without leaving a comment.
Log in to join the conversation and Like this content.
|
|
|
|
Huw (Jul 2nd 2021) |
|
Total Likes: 1 |
|
 Re: Proper accuracy testing of nibp
#76387
Jul 1st a 10:20 AM
|
| by Adrian Jones |
| Adrian Jones |
We have a Fluke ProSim4 Vital Signs Simulator that we use for such devices but generally we know how to get in to the engineering / verification mode.
Where a user has managed to purchase a device we cannot find information on we use the simulator and keep records on that particular monitor and refer back to them.
Depending on the algotithm the manufacturer uses you should get consistent results using a simulator such as the Fluke.
|
|
|
1 members (saeedumar2),
62
guests, and
8
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums25
Topics10,860
Posts72,869
Members9,979
| |
Most Online5,980
Jan 29th, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
