Find a solid steel P clip and they rip the back of the device out.
Which would be a clear indication that someone simply dragged (snatched?) the equipment away expecting the IEC mains lead to pull out of its socket.
Call me Old School (OK, I'm Old School) but I cannot understand the thinking there. Do they leave the gas pipelines and patient tubing plugged in as well? Indeed, do they even bother to power the equipment down before zooming off?
Also, how many times do we hear of (or find) that (rather than at the IEC connector end) the mains cable has been yanked out at the wall outlet? Likely damaging both the mains wall plug and/or socket, of course. British BS 1363 plugs and sockets are not designed for a straight pull (the cable, quite rightly, being at right-angles to the plug pins) ... unlike the standard US Hospital Grade and many Euro plugs.
No doubt I am not the only one who has seen IEC mains cables dangling forlornly side by side from trunking (ICU. NICU, CCU
etc.), supposedly looking forward to the return of equipment they were once connected to (and probably supplied with). Unless switched at the outlet (some may be) they will all be energised. Depending upon cable lengths, some may be available as either trip, spillage or fluid-related electrical hazards; all easily avoided.
Other points:- if such practices have indeed become the norm (been tolerated), then all those "swappable" IEC mains cables should be of the same rating (probably 10A) and each wall plug fused at the same value. Otherwise, the whole concept of electrical safety and resilience becomes a joke.
Regarding EST regimes:- detachable mains cables could be colour coded, or "ringed" (like medical gas hoses) for different years. They could also be "asset tagged" ... either individually or to match the original parent equipment. Which is the best method? Who knows. Again, to my mind, all this stuff should be dealt with in a sensible and consistent manner across all healthcare settings.