I'm surprised that the SSBG have put their name to this form. In addition to the typo previously mentioned, part 2 is simply cut and pasted from the original PPQ and consequently the numbering of part 2 begins at question 5, whereas part 1 ends at question 64!
The declaration appears at the end of part 1, so does it not relate to part 2?
Also, the suppliers reference which was at the top of the page on the original PPQ now appears randomly half way down the page (between question 6b and 6c).
Not to mention that parts 1 and 2 have very different formats... hardly a professional looking document and not one that I would take seriously if I were a manufacturer or supplier.
