EBME Forums Forums Free discussion Free discussion [poll]What do YOU use to check the accuracy of infusion devices?

Aha John – riposte!

Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem!

Damnant Qvod Non Intelligvnt. Animadvertistine, ubicumque stes, fumum recta in faciem ferri?

Errare humanum est! Et tu John.

Ian.

I would scrub that post if I were you John the mans a savage.

Richard,
If i knew what it meant i might do that. I would appreciate the english version Ian. It does interest me - the meaning that is... i assume there is some humour in the transcript. Anyway, if this topic is exhausted i will close it. Another 24 hours....

It possibly comes under the but it's quite subjective being Latin and all that.

"Errore" not "Errare" I think Ian.

If thats latin no wonder its almost a dead language. Trying to translate it is a pig. I'm not supprised the Romans changed to italian as chatting up birds in latin would be impossible you would get a slap after the first word.

Leonius,

You're right there, but it does have a sort of ring to it don't you think.

Something some verbose people should enjoy really!

[John - please check your e-mails for a private riposte!]

Ian

Pumps still in spec Ian? Or are you still looking for a wonder-set that will give you 0% errare? Or should that be 0 percenti?

Red-Herring - to introduce an irrelevant issue into a discussion. As in why discuss set-tolerances when the system runs in spec. Ahh, of course, just to introduce the fact that you're clever and have designed your own weighing scales. Doh! Is that verbose enough or shall I try harder?