Home Articles Downloads Forum Products Services EBME Expo Contact
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#10629 28/05/06 10:08 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Graham,

If individuals end up on protected pay, i.e. have long-term protection applied because AfC banded pay is lower than pre-AfC pay, I thought the 2.5% cost of living increase would actually apply to their current salary minus the protected portion of pay. It's the protected portion that doesn't attract the 2.5% as far as I understand it. Is this not the way it works?

#10630 03/06/06 12:12 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 464
Sage
Offline
Sage
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 464
Richard,

I like a bit of French..but, I prefer a Brazilian?
My dept was 'lucky' to be banded, so protection wasn't required.
No, I don't jest on such a serious jubject. I think that you may be right in what've stated. All that I can remember, pre matching, was that I didn't want to have pay protection.
I was happy being an MTO3( I've worked my way up through MTO1,2 and 3. Band 5, apart from the £ notes,didn't allow for 'mental progression'. I'm comfortable with band 6 and all that it entails.

Cheers
Mark

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  DaveC in Oz, RoJo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
4 members (AndySkippy, Geoff Hannis, daisizhou, 1 invisible), 23,082 guests, and 24 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
AndySkippy, happyvet, Abdulaziz abed, Fernando Henz, Nick.A
10,375 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics11,264
Posts74,534
Members10,375
Most Online59,530
Apr 30th, 2026
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5