So, has everyone decided that for a fact the VRCT is pointless at this moment in time and holds no benefit???
Considering some of the arguments put forward previously in this thread, in my opinion registration with EC(UK), i.e. CEng, IEng, EngTech, and the necessary membership of any professional institution should be considered as "pointless" as inclusion on the VRCT and membership of IPEM is.
I say this because registration and membership of a professional institution are not yet essential requirements in NHS medical engineering (maintenance) job descriptions and the roles are not being regulated at all.
When medical engineering jobs are regulated is when
appropriate registration will matter - for those coming into the profession and others moving inbetween jobs, potentially. Meanwhile, following the arguments put forward already, any membership or registration is wasted money and irrelevant.
What's important if individuals' are considering registering with EC(UK) and who aspire to being considered fully qualified to practice in medical engineering is whether the EC(UK) registration is going to be recognised by the HPC as meeting
all of the requirements for working in a NHS "Clinical Technologist" job-role - not just the fact that you're registered as a technician or engineer, in my opinion.
Personally speaking, at this time, I can't see that CEng, IEng or EngTech registration with EC(UK), alone, for example, are necessarily going to be acceptable for inclusion on the HPC register, if it materialises, without some evidence of minimum acceptable plus relevant experience, skills and training in medical engineering specifically.
It defeats the object of regulation of specific job-roles otherwise. Personally I wouldn't bank on registration with EC(UK) being a method of EC(UK) registered "Technicians" and "Engineers" "getting in through the HPC back door" as HPC registered "Clinical Technologists", in future, not without giving extra evidence and re-registering with the HPC.
Financially speaking membership of an institution and registration with a body that're not likely to be involved with regulation of "Clinical Technologists", if and when it does transpire, may be more of a waste of time and money than membership of the VRCT and IPEM is at the moment.