Home Articles Downloads Forum Products Services EBME Expo Contact
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
#21225 07/02/05 11:21 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 142
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 142
Graham I hope you got that in writing.
I bet the MDRA will not remember the call.
I've seen some very dodgy tattoo equipment in the past and make sure it's still fit for the purpose.
For insurance purposes of course, surgeons sue to.
I would also like to ask where in the hospital this device is being used ?, not theatres!

#21226 07/02/05 11:26 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 142
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 142
So following that lasers for removing crows feet on skin surrounding the eyes might not come under MDRA recommendations.
Sorry about this statement.
laugh

#21227 07/02/05 1:01 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 90
Adept
Offline
Adept
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 90
The reply from the MHRA came by e-mail so if you'd like to see a copy send me your e-mail address and I'll forward a copy (graham.r.barnes@york.nhs.uk)
Graham

#21228 07/02/05 2:19 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 39
Visionary
OP Offline
Visionary
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 39
Since the tattooing procedure causes the needle to pierce the skin and produce some bleeding from the site, this would have been classed as an invasive procedure. Coupled with the fact that blood is a good conductor of Electricity and the tatoos are in this case directly across the patients chest a minimum requirement for the equipment should be BF?

mad

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  DaveC in Oz, RoJo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
1 members (daisizhou), 11,811 guests, and 18 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Chris 11, j9_PLC, nece, Vitya, Shenzhen007
10,358 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics11,249
Posts74,482
Members10,358
Most Online59,530
Apr 30th, 2026
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5