I am still sticking to IEC 60601-1 and IEC60601-1-2.
I see, you are obviously re-manufacturing all the items you test? As IEC 60601 is a standard to bring a device to market. It is not designed for in service testing or use after repair!
In fact you are going against the MHRA document DB2006(5) which sates that an appropriate standard should be use but not IEC 60601. Since the IEC 62353 is now a British standard BS EN 62353.
What is the problem with 62353? Have you actually tried it or understood it?
One of the big points that most seem to miss or not realise the significance of is the need to compare the test results with previous results. This is not done in 60601 as all that matters is whether it passes or fails the limit values.
In 62353 you have to look at previous test values to see if there has been a significant change which would indicate a potential failure. In fact many manufactures set limits as to how much a value may change from the initial factory or acceptance test value. As an example a Siemens ultrasound unit is only allowed an increase in any leakage value of 1.5 times the initial value or 10uA whichever is the greater! This would never be picked up in an IEC 60601 test!
I understand there are those that don't like change and may see performing fewer tests (as required by 62353) as somehow unsafe but in fact if performed correctly they are in fact much safer that those of 60601 as they will pick up faults that 60601 would miss.
Open your eyes and your mind and embrace the new standard.
I particularly like the Alternative test method as, where it is suitable for use, it works really well and saves lots of time booting up and down PC based devices between tests. (That statement will open up a whole new debate!)