Home Articles Downloads Forum Products Services EBME Expo Contact
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#39507 15/07/09 9:43 AM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 300
Master
OP Offline
Master
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 300
Hi Team

I am looking for a sample specification for a medical laser. The present requirements are for TURP and another for Urological 'stones', though we are also looking at purchasing ENT lasers.

A general or specific specification is all that I need as a sample to extract good and pertinent sections to produce one that meets with our needs.

Assuming that not all purchases are from the national framework agreement for these devices, then a specification will have needed to be produced, OJEU, etc.

We are also looking at the Thulium laser product, do any of you guys have any experience with these from a technical evaluation, clinical trials, reliability perspective, etc?

Thanks

Jim

Last edited by JIM GAVIN; 15/07/09 9:44 AM.

Jim Gavin
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 18
Hero
Offline
Hero
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 18
Equipment specs are not free, just purchased a lithotripsy laser through a tender using my specs, send PM for costing.


I am not Flippant, I am Smart
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,814
Likes: 72
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,814
Likes: 72

Hey ... everybody's at it this morning! Go for it Mate! smile

But whilst I applaud your sentiments, Neil, please don't forget that Jim works within the framework of the British National Health Service. So it is quite probable that one of his colleagues (in another NHS hospital, perhaps) has already worked up a generic spec that fits the bill!


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 18
Hero
Offline
Hero
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 18
So you are saying that his colleagues should donate for free, because they both work in the NHS. In that case the NHS should have their own specs, but as with NHS documentation especially engineering "they don't come free"


I am not Flippant, I am Smart
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,814
Likes: 72
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,814
Likes: 72

You're preaching to the converted there, Mate, as far as I'm concerned. I take the simplistic (naïve?) view that the NHS belongs to the People. It is paid for by the People, and it's for the benefit of the People.

So, any work that's done in NHS time is done for the People, and anything produced in NHS time belongs to the People.

The documents I imagine you are referring to (HEI's, Health Building Notes ... or whatever such things are called these days) are freely available to those working within the NHS, but have to be paid for (quite rightly) by outsiders (of which, of course, I am one).

Yes, the NHS should have their own specs, developed and held centrally for use when required. If the MoH in Riyadh can do it (and they do), why not the NHS in the UK? smile


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 18
Hero
Offline
Hero
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 18
The MOH is done in word format with a simple yes/no answer, mine is done in excel format asking for values, ranges, accessories plus all relevant details regarding installation, pre-installation etc. Thats why I charge.


I am not Flippant, I am Smart
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,814
Likes: 72
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,814
Likes: 72

Sounds like you're talking about an RFQ ... or PPQ, there Neil.

I was thinking more about the equipment specs held by the MoH (National Guard, MODA, Royal Commission et al). The MoH had their own (actually I know the origin of them ... they weren't done in Riyadh, of course ... not back in 1976 at any rate). And some of the others just mentioned are based upon American Federal Specs, ECRI and other sources.

But the key thing is that standard equipment specs are held, in a rationalised and standardised format, they continue to be developed in light of experience, and are used when seeking tenders for new equipment (not to mention new hospitals)!

RFQ : Request for Quotation (or Request for Proposal)
PPQ : Pre-Purchase Questionnaire

There's nothing wrong with consultants charging for their services. They (we) have to eat just like everyone else! smile


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 13
Huw Offline
Hero
Offline
Hero
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 13
Originally Posted By: Geoff Hannis
The MoH had their own (actually I know the origin of them ... they weren't done in Riyadh, of course ... not back in 1976 at any rate).


They were when I was there. I did them.

Huw #39557 16/07/09 11:39 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,814
Likes: 72
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,814
Likes: 72

Looks like I've flushed you out, then, Mate! smile

As I've already mentioned, one of the key things about them is that they continued to be developed!

Frankly (during my time), a lot of them were [censored]! Those couldn't have been the ones you did, of course!

But, to be honest, I haven't come across a set of specs yet from any source that weren't deficient in some respect. Just as long as there is a mechanism for correcting them (and, unfortunately, there have been occasions when there hasn't been), that doesn't matter overly much. Just as long as someone in the loop has, shall we say, a clue! smile


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 13
Huw Offline
Hero
Offline
Hero
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 13
Originally Posted By: Geoff Hannis
Frankly (during my time), a lot of them were [censored]! Those couldn't have been the ones you did, of course!


I would hope not - but if you saw any from the (very) late eighties - they would have been mine.

Back on topic please smile

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  DaveC in Oz, RoJo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
1 members (daisizhou), 3,789 guests, and 303 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Mark B, Royal, davidarhui, Czr, Jimmy Li
10,391 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics11,279
Posts74,591
Members10,391
Most Online69,877
Jul 17th, 2026
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5