Home Articles Downloads Forum Products Services EBME Expo Contact
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#51153 24/12/10 2:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 43
Technologist
OP Offline
Technologist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 43
Hi Chaps,

It occurs to me that having spent numerous years servicing & repairing critical medical devices, no one has ever formally asked me or checked if I know what I am doing!

Obviously interviews are necessary in order to get a job and qualifications applicable to the field support an individual’s knowledge but, in the ever developing nature of our work how can we be sure we are up to speed with current tech and that trainees are receiving adequate & accurate support/information?

I'd like to hear any opinions/ideas on how one could 'measure' (Qualitatively) the results of training an individual/department may have received, be it from external training or by spending a period of time 'shadowing' a more experience tech.

Your comments are appreciated.

Incidentally, I do know what I’m doing (at least that’s my opinion!)

Thanks.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71

No one ever challenged you ... because you had that air of confidence and competence about you, Robert! smile

But yes - being judged by one's peers is probably the most ... er, illuminating!


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 32
Hero
Offline
Hero
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 32
Hi Rob,

Qualititative measures can never 'prove' that someone is competent, but you could quantatively compare the performance of one qualified person against a group of qualified professionals using asset tracking data.


Be Proactive and reactive.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71

... or better yet (and as Robert has already alluded to), and far cheaper still, let one of the Old Sweats spend a couple of hours with the tech in question. smile


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 43
Technologist
OP Offline
Technologist
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 43
Thanks John,

Sounds interesting, could you ellaborate a little regarding 'asset tracking data'?
confused

Thanks,

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,020
Hero
Offline
Hero
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,020
Dare I mention professional registration (e.g. VRCT) where you have to keep a portfolio of your activities and how you are keeping yourself up to date and expanding your knowledge? This is then inspected - albeit at random - to make sure you are maintaining competency.
Head back down before the flack starts flying.
RoJo


My spelling is not bad. I am typing this on a Medigenic keyboard and I blame that for all my typos.
RoJo #51265 29/12/10 4:30 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71

On the other hand, I suppose you could always "maintain competency" by simply carrying on doing your job. That is, by being competent. whistle

"Portfolio of your activities"? What's that? Do you mean your time-sheet?


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71

Originally Posted By: Robert Tattersall
Sounds interesting, could you ellaborate a little regarding 'asset tracking data'?

I think John means a check on who is doing (has done) the actual work (eg, by checking whose initials appear most often in equipment histories, job reports etc.).

Either that or he his advocating the RFID tagging of all his techs (you know, to see who spends the most time in the coffee shop, chatting up the nurses, or otherwise "standing still")! whistle


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 40
Technologist
Offline
Technologist
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 40
There's some guidance in DB2006(05)Managing Medical Devices. Section 8.1.1 recommends random audits be carried out to verify correct repair and maintenance procedures are being adhered to.Also, section 8.3.1 gives guidance regarding training and experience of staff.

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 578
Likes: 1
Philosopher
Offline
Philosopher
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 578
Likes: 1
Originally Posted By: Geoff Hannis
On the other hand, I suppose you could always "maintain competency" by simply carrying on doing your job. That is, by being competent. whistle
Dinosaurs probably carried on what they doing right upto the moment they sunk into the tar pit! whistle

These days there is the need keep up with your training and CPD otherwise you may find you've become the Dinosaur.

Quote:
"Portfolio of your activities"? What's that? Do you mean your time-sheet?
I take it he means similar to the lines as preparing for Engineering registration and not VRCT, a time sheet just shows you've turned up.

Although before I worked in the NHS the company I use to work for used job codes. There was codes for user abuse, bad workmanship, warranty failure, and various other reasons for failure. Along with tracking the number of times an item was returned in a year, competency and training issues could be identified in both staff and customers.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  DaveC in Oz, RoJo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
1 members (Lee V Shanley), 1,097 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
j9_PLC, nece, Vitya, Shenzhen007, Eng. Craig
10,357 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics11,248
Posts74,481
Members10,357
Most Online37,242
Apr 12th, 2026
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5