|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84
Adept
|
Adept
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84 |
I have been using the IMT medical PF300/301 for about a year now.. and have also used the fluke VT Plus. Between these two i find the PF 300/301 better. It has a better UI and when you connect the analyzer to a computer.. we can clearly visualize the flow and pressure graphs and change the scales on both axis as we wish. The software also generates the report with the graph and the numeric parameters are user programmable, i.e, you can select the number and parameter you want to have on your report, wheras the VT that i have used did not allow for that.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8
Newbie
|
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8 |
Thanks. May you know, how the IMT medical PF300 works with high frequency mode on the ventilator? Another question - do you know how many hours there are in recording duration on fluke VT Plus?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 69
Scholar
|
Scholar
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 69 |
Did you try Vt on window software for your vt hf, u can do lot of thing with this software
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84
Adept
|
Adept
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84 |
Mudriy1977 sir, The HF mode in the PF 300 was beautiful. The waveform generation was in particular good. IIRC, the VT Plus does not have recording ability. I could be wrong though. Hope this Helps.
Guna Sir, I haven't used the VT software for VT Plus. In fact i did not realise that the VT Flow had a software suite. Will try it out when i get the chance. Thanks for the head's up.
|
|
|
|
1 members (daisizhou),
3,201
guests, and
12
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums26
Topics11,274
Posts74,576
Members10,384
| |
Most Online69,877 Jul 17th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|