Sounds like we have a little bit of everything!
We have a Medical Equipment Committee (comprising the major clinical directors, finance, EBME, purchasing) with responsibility for approving ALL medical equipment purchases (replacement or additional), and including capital development programmes. Users are constrained from purchasing directly, even if they have identified a funding source.
A sub committee of MEC (comprising EBME (chair), Risk mgt/Health/Safety, Infection control) review all applications prior to going to MEC to examine any related issues in respect of compliance, standardisation, decontamination etc.
MEC have direct control of equipment capital and revenue budgets (although in reality this is not enough to allow us to even stand still - nothing new there I suppose).
Its major problems are related to prioritisation of scarce resources - measuring one bids validity with respect to the next, and arguments can be 'skewed' by clinical directors arguing more passionately for their own areas. Far from perfect , but does maintain a fair degree of control/standardisation, and requires good justification.
..........this could be an interesting thread
