As I’ve probably mentioned before, I advocate the approach of treating the hospital as a system. Improvements are needed everywhere, but let's start with the wards.
In my opinion, the equipment situation in a typical hospital ward is often, frankly, a chaotic mess. I see portable equipment of many types (NIBP "monitors", suction pumps, ECG recorders, pulse oximeters, infusion pumps and all the rest) scattered about all over the place, generally in the corridors, often in various stages of neglect, with depleted batteries, missing, incorrect or grotty "accessories", tangled (and mangled) patient cables,
etc., etc. A scene familiar to you all, I’m sure.
In the hospital of the future, I hope we will see architects with vision providing "equipment bays" (or alcoves), with trunking containing a multitude of power socket outlets (RCD protected, naturally) and "docking stations" for all portable and mobile equipment.
The Equipment Bay should be the first port of call for the Equipment Librarian, and could also be under camera surveillance as well.
As for the equipment itself, I propose a new standard where as much as possible (
ie, tending towards
all of it) will be essentially battery powered ("cordless"), to be returned to the docking station after use for re-charging, automatic re-calibration and also downloading of data into the central patient management system. Yes, even suction pumps. Bits of kit will communicate with each other where necessary, and also tell the biomeds’ computer when servicing is due or repairs are needed. Our amazing new spec will call upon a special medical version of Bluetooth (or similar) technology to reduce (leading towards elimination of) the need for patient "probe cables". Needless to say, our new spec will include RFID tagging built in to every piece of equipment.
Just imagine a world without IEC mains cables and patient leads! Must this be only a dream?
It will mean manufacturers co-operating (rather than constantly competing for commercial advantage), it will mean clinical staff working together with architects and building services engineers, it will also mean IT people working together with biomedical engineers. Not something that should be beyond the realms of possibility in a
National Health Service, surely?
