Home Articles Downloads Forum Products Services EBME Expo Contact
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#3139 08/07/05 10:48 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 327
SAJEEV Offline OP
Master
OP Offline
Master
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 327
Could you please guide me to select a better Blood gas analyser out of the following vendors?

1.Nova Biomedical
2.Radiometer
3.Roche
4.Bayer
5.IL
Please have your comments too
Regards
Sajeev

#3140 08/07/05 1:51 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 73
Scholar
Offline
Scholar
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 73
Sajeev,

Martin Braley at Trafford General is the person to contact over this.

If you send me an email with specific questions I will forward for you.

We have looked quite closely at IL & Roche to replace existing machines and work as first line on both of the PoCT machines we have in SCBU & ICU/HDU.

#3141 08/07/05 9:08 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 51
Scholar
Offline
Scholar
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 51
Dear Sajeev,

You can go Roche...its best..

#3142 09/07/05 5:53 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 15
Novice
Offline
Novice
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 15
dear sajeev,
roch is easy to be handled in house biomedical.

ashoke

#3143 11/07/05 6:05 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9
Novice
Offline
Novice
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9
DEAR SANGEEV

IF YOU ARE LOOKING BASIC UNIT U CAN CONSIDER M248 FROM BAYER OR ABL 5 BOTH ARE RELIABLE AND CONSIDERED MAINTENANCE FREE ONLY ABL5 REQUIRED TO CNANGE JACKETS BUT ITS ELECTRODES ARE MORE LASTING THEN M248

#3144 11/07/05 7:05 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 80
Adept
Offline
Adept
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 80
Sajeev,

Other the technical considerations mentioned by the other memebers regarding choice of the BGA, I would consider the running cost of the unit. The cost of the consumables (reagents, kits, controls, gas etc.)and also including the electrodes can be a significant factor to consider. The pratice is our hospital is to get the BGA "free of cost" against the purchase of consumables. At the momenet we are using 248 and 348 from Bayer, which are good, but from this year we are considering Radiometer manily due to the running cost. If space and portability is a consideration, then check out the Nova. Lastly, insist on the vendor to supply the gas cylinder holders from saftey point of view.

#3145 12/07/05 8:47 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 47
Technologist
Offline
Technologist
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 47
We have around 10 Bayers within our trust, and although we do get the occasional clot they are ok unless it's 4 in the morning and your fast asleep when the pager goes off.

#3146 13/07/05 6:19 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 31
Dreamer
Offline
Dreamer
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 31
Thanks Sanjeev,

I am an ABG Specialist and have been trained in Roche, Bayer, AVL and ABL blood gas machines. Blood gas analyers are very sensitive, consumes more time for troubleshooting due to their nature of analysis. All blood gas analysers give you nightmare at any time if not maintained regularly by users and engineers. We clean all our Roche analysers using deproteiniser once a week minimum to avoid clots and protein deposits on electrodes, mostly on chloride and calcium electrodes . I have worked on all kinds of Bayer ABGs like 200+, 300+, 400+, 800+, etc. Bayer machines are quite stable and electrodes are long lasting . Currently, we are using OMNI C and OMNI 6 which are from ROCHE-AVL . They are quite stable with ready sensors but they don't last as committed by sales bigwicks. I have experienced electrodes lasting between 6 - 12 months max . ABL is still using jackets as some one mentioned earlier which requires frequent maintenance eventhough ABL is the pioneer in ABG productions. IL and Nova have their own merits and demerits and they could be considered in the second category.

Hope this helps.

Sen

#3147 14/07/05 1:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12
Novice
Offline
Novice
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12
I/L have a blood gas machine called the GEM which we have been using on our unit for 4 years.
This machine uses cartridges which contain all the reagents and the electrodes, so there is no maintenance, if there is a problem the staff just insert a new pack and 30 minutes later can carry on sampling. The unused samples in the pack are credited back to you.
We do not get any callouts to this machine and life is a lot simpler.Our unit does about 100 samples a day, so machine down time is not a thing that goes down very well in our unit so this machine fits the bill very well

#3148 15/08/05 8:55 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 27
Dreamer
Offline
Dreamer
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 27
We look after Roche and Radiometer analysers. We are concerned about the Roche calibrations as it will Calibrate at about any value. Radiometer monitors these calibrations to see if all is ok, it will warn you if calibration points have drifted too much or when they are outside expected windows of operation. Also with Radiometer analysers you can check data & qc plots while the machine is doing something like a measurement, whereas on the Roche you will just have to wait until it has done it's thing before you can look at anything. Our choice would be the Radiometer out of these two.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  DaveC in Oz, RoJo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
2 members (daisizhou, Diego Lins), 7,659 guests, and 25 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Janet, james_on_ebme, Biomed Egypt, Nektarios K., Keisya Andretta
10,364 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics11,254
Posts74,506
Members10,364
Most Online59,530
Apr 30th, 2026
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5