Home Articles Downloads Forum Products Services EBME Expo Contact
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
My apologies if it came across as a lecture or a lesson, unfortunately that's the way it comes out - just some observatons off the top of my head based on fixing them and setting up occlusion alarms using wet setups and force gauges. I'd always recommend a manufacturers course as a starter, I'm just discussing what I've seen and measured in practice. If anyone can add any extra knowledge, opinions or information I'd be grateful since I'm open to any servicing tips or observations that people have. Thanks.

Just one correction:

Quote:
Losses will still vary in use on the patient as will the conditions at the infusion site (thus the occlusion alarm pressure will vary) but the maximum force generated by the syringe driver, hence maximum theoretical occlusion pressure, is fixed to an acceptable absolute maximum force measured by removing unknown sources of error in the calibration.
Do you change DU washers and PAB bearing on service Jerry?

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 139
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 139
WE use Force Measurement Systems force gauge. However,although the was developed in conjunction with Graseby I have founf that it is not suitable for use with the 3000 series. We have reverted back to the Dial gauge method or hung weight. I believe that Graseby recommend the Force Measurement Systems unit for the Omnifuse.


Time is of the essence. Don't abuse it. Just make the most of it.
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
What problems have you had with using force gauges with the 3X00 series Joe?

We find they are useful for checking consistency of force/occlusion threshold, limiting the maximum force produced by the syringe drivers, which is ultimately what has the potential to generate damaging pressures at the cannula when an occlusion occurs. We try to ensure consistency by running-in the mechanics to minimise losses in the mechanism and calibrate without syringe-induced losses hopefully, if anything, to give an overestmate rather than an underestimate of the equivalent occlusion pressure that could be attained when in use.

In syringe manfacturing standards the variation allowed in syringe stiction is something equivalent to 3kgf I think so I can't see how calibration using a syringe is reliable unless the syringe is well lubricated to reduce stiction to a negligible value and a standard extension line is used.

Without use of a force gauge we've found it very difficult to setup 3300's for use with pre-filled syringes - the operators suffer with nuisance alarms if we use wet setup since inconsistencies at calibration cause problems. I think Jim Lefever at the MHRA has suggested, as I have previously mentioned being described in a letter published in a journal, that increasing the force is a way reduce the incidence of nuisance alarms on these pumps.

We set to 5kgf (tolerance 4.5kgf to 5.5kgf in the Graseby manual) and our nuisance alarms due to occlusion disappeared. Anyhing lower than 4.7kgf caused occlusion alarms - I assumed/have established that variability in the syringe stiction was the predominant factor along with the relatively fixed characteristics in the line/anti-syphon valve. We couldn't have reliably measured/examined/set these maximum acceptable occlusion thresholds without the force gauge.

When measured, carefully, using wet setup and well lubricated BD50 syringe this force equates to pressure values that are within the equivalent Graseby specification at occlusion. If a "sticky" syringe is fitted then the pressure losses will be higher thus occlusion pressure measured at the cannula will tend to be lower. This is safer, in my view, than calibrating occlusion thresholds with a "typical", potentially "sticky", syringe, at a particular pressure value, given a particuar syringe characteristic, then when a "loose" syringe is fitted in use then there is the potential for higher occlusion pressures, above the maximum acceptable value, to be generated.

My thinking is that if the maximum force generated by the pump is consistent at a value that produces equivalent, acceptable, occlusion pressure thresholds (for a given syringe type/line) via calibration using a force measurements then it's better than setting occlusion alarms using a wetsetup that's inconsistent and unpredictable (using a syringe/line setup that gives unpredictable results). Worst thing that can happen is you get nuisance occlusion alarms - this is more acceptable than excessive occlusion pressures than could cause injury.

Repeatable wet setup calibration is only possible, in my view, if you measure stiction (a rough test can be done by releasing the syringe actuator under pressure and seeing what residual pressure is indicated on the test manometer, at rest, after the plunger is forced back out of the syringe body - and this is only a guide) or reduce it to a minimum by lubricating the syringe well. Either way the stiction then needs to be added to the pressure measured at occlusion to give an indication of the potential pressure that could be generated given an ideal stictionless syringe - however this still does not include the pressure gradient in the line (that is probably negligible as occlusion is approach and flow approaches zero, anyhow).

The problem is always going to be finding the occlusion pressure to force relationship for typical syringes used on these pumps and the pressure gradients in the line at different rates, with different viscosity of fluids and various check-valve/cannula-gauge/anti-syphon arrangements. A selection of sizes and manufacturers syringes may be used in different hospitals so this may complicate the issue. Perhaps I need to go on a 3X00 refresher course to se how it is done these days.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  DaveC in Oz, RoJo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 4,867 guests, and 20 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Chris 11, j9_PLC, nece, Vitya, Shenzhen007
10,358 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics11,248
Posts74,481
Members10,358
Most Online37,242
Apr 12th, 2026
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5