Not recommended, Joe, in my opinion! I've never seen a case where the requirements of biomed, M&E and building services peacefully co-existed!
Far better, I would suggest, to have
two systems. One for Facilities ("Estates", or whatever it's called where you are), and one for biomed. Different mind-sets, different approaches.
Generally speaking, Facilities are orientated towards calendar-based PM (or, perhaps, hours-run), with the asset being the focus. Whilst biomed is primarily about providing technical services to the clinical equipment
user (rather than the equipment itself
per se), and orientated towards PM based on
risk.
I could go on ... but I'll spare you the lecture (unless, that is, you
want more). Meanwhile, this topic has been touched on a few times before, if you'd like to do a search. For instance, there was a
thread that seemed to be saying that Help desks often don't (as it were)! It all needs a great deal of thought!
