Home Articles Downloads Forum Products Services EBME Expo Contact
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
#38982 19/06/09 11:06 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 130
JoLee Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 130
Rightio another question that will open a can of worms methinks! rolleyes I am interested in what banding people are on when responsible for managing an equipment library.
This is controversial, as I know there is a huge mix of banding and skill bases around, but could anyone let me know if they are a Band 6 and if so what their JD is? Is anyone a qualified nurse and what band they are at?

I am a nurse and am currently on a Band 5, but manage staff and have responsibilities beyond my current banding - hence I am considering attmpting a re banding, as you might have guessed?
Any help would be appreciated. confused

JoLee #38985 19/06/09 11:35 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71

Surely the pay band should be pegged to the job, not the person? If an academic genius chooses to work in an Equipment Library (or, indeed, as a hospital porter ... or anything else for that matter), that's OK. It's up to them. And, personally, I admire such people (I sometimes do work that some would regard as menial myself).

But they should not also expect special treatment when it comes to pay, just because they have a PhD (or whatever). smile


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Geoff Hannis #38992 19/06/09 12:31 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 797
Likes: 1
KM Offline
Philosopher
Offline
Philosopher
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 797
Likes: 1
The banding should be for the job not the individual,thats right.
The overriding thing that affects what band your post is given is who sits on the evaluation banding panel and how awkward they want to be.
We had lots of trouble and eventually the whole department went to full JAQ. Even then we heard from a wall that had ears that a SNM who sat on a panel argued that we didnt do core things within our function.
Best bit of advice I got was find a bod thats sat on job evaluation panels and is friendly to you request and knows a bit about what you do. Then let them pick your JAQ to pieces before you give it in.
And dont underestimate the power of descriptive wording, panels have long list of what a word means e.g difference between manage and organise. They will take you very literally in what you put down on paper.



Geoff Hannis #38993 19/06/09 12:33 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,020
Hero
Offline
Hero
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,020
As geoff says it is the job description not the person who gets the band.
Go through your job description and score it against the AfC rules and see what band it comes out at then add in lots of things to score you points.
E.G. "Frequently lifting heavy loads" rather than just "moving equipment".
The big points scorers are managing a budget and high qualifications. Nursing is degree level but if you put in that you need further qualifications or experience equivalent to higher qualifications you will score more points.

Rememebr points mean prizes.
Robert


My spelling is not bad. I am typing this on a Medigenic keyboard and I blame that for all my typos.
KM #38994 19/06/09 12:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71

I appreciate that it's not your system, Karl. But are we meant to be impressed by any of that?

Ditto Robert.

Keywords. Catch phrases. Ticking boxes. What a lousy system!

Which (over-paid, incompetent) baboon came up with all that, I wonder?

To me, the whole thing stinks! frown


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Geoff Hannis #38995 19/06/09 12:38 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,020
Hero
Offline
Hero
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,020
Yes, but these are the rules we have to play by like it or not.

Robert

Still on a Clinical Scientist pay scale because of the poor AfC banding


My spelling is not bad. I am typing this on a Medigenic keyboard and I blame that for all my typos.
RoJo #38996 19/06/09 12:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71

Out of respect for my good friend JoLee ... I must decline to comment further! frown


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Geoff Hannis #38999 19/06/09 1:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 768
Philosopher
Offline
Philosopher
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 768
To be fair ROJO and to pick up on your own point, the banding relates to the job and not the person. Therefore if you have decided to remain on a Clinical Scientist grade because your AfC banding placed you at a point where there was no advantage or even a disadvantage with regard to pay, then you can't blame the system for not rewarding the role and recognising you the individual.


Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own.
RoJo #39002 19/06/09 2:52 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 338
Master
Offline
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 338
I did not think a clinical scientists pay was all that bad to be fair...


It is better to be reactive than radioactive...
JoLee #39003 19/06/09 3:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
Philosopher
Offline
Philosopher
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
Getting back to Jo's orginal question, I put this reply in a previous thread:-


Quote:
To match an AFC job description for banding, two sections ‘must be’ matched; the Knowledge, training and experience (section 2) and Freedom to Act (section 12), you may then fail to match up to 4 of the other sections and as long as you reach the relevant job evaluation score you should get the band.



The staff on the matching panel will not know many of the jobs that they are evaluating; so it is up to the person writing the job description to ensure that the required wording is covered, (for example if the Job profile says “analysing faults in complex multifaceted equipment put it in your job description). If you go for re banding then ensure you use the words from the job profile to make it easy for the evaluation panel to see that you tick the boxes.

Lee


Don't forget "we've never had it so good".
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  DaveC in Oz, RoJo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
1 members (daisizhou), 12,746 guests, and 20 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Chris 11, j9_PLC, nece, Vitya, Shenzhen007
10,358 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics11,249
Posts74,482
Members10,358
Most Online59,530
Apr 30th, 2026
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5