The fact that one or two lucky guys might be raking it in over in the private sector doesn't take anything away from what I'm saying.
There are hundreds of techs in secure, comfortable positions who work in the NHS, and good luck to them. But no-one is under threat, as far as I am aware.
Meanwhile, on the "outside" there are also guys who are out of work, and struggling to find a decent position. Some of us (at our stage of the game) never will, regardless of "experience, talent" or even "enthusiasm". How does that square with what some of you guys are trying to project?
So yes, you might find that rates of pay for
for those in work might look "attractive" on the face of it. But how would those figures shape up if set against all the
zeroes of out-of-work techs?
Lastly, whomever comes up with those "studies" would only be talking to blokes in salaried positions, would they not? They may even have some sort of
agenda (always check to see where their funding comes from). But they sure as hell won't be taking freelancers, the self-employed, job-seekers ... or charity workers into consideration.
That's the Reality of the Parallel Universe, be it
Dark or brilliant shafts of light!
