Sensational Attention Grabbing Headline?
In 2013 over 13,000 incidents were reported to the UK regulator relating to faulty medical equipment, which led to over 300 deaths and almost 5,000 serious injuries. Having read the report, should we insert "were initially reported" as relating to faulty medical equipment. How many of these faulty medical equipment reports were ultimately determined as being caused by clinical user error, clinical training issues, maladministration etc.? It is all too easy to blame the medical equipment, when an investigation reveals it to be performing in line with specification. (This happens with alarming regularity). Is such an assertion fairly typical in this field?
How many of these reported faulty medical equipment deaths were due to the "Rogue Unregistered Biomedical Engineer" improperly calibrating or validating medical equipment?, or in fact due to any NHS (or other) Biomedical Engineer? (or in fact, the lack of one).
When scrutinising the reference section, the MHRA is not even mentioned, so where do these figures come from?

Echoes of the Patient Safety Campaign? which made a number of bold assertions, which when scrutinised, could not be supported with facts.
If I could just find a shroud waving posting icon....