Home Articles Downloads Forum Products Services EBME Expo Contact
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 13
Huw Offline
Hero
Offline
Hero
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 13
Indeed, actually - I thought this forum already was a 'network'.

Happy to listen to ways to improve things though.

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
At the moment I get the impression that IPEM is the only option if we are regulated under the auspices of the HPC and our NHS employer (I am employed by the NHS) requires some of those in more senior roles, perhaps, to be regulated. The HPC has made it clear in consultation documentation that they will "honour" the application made by the VRCT.

It's also apparent from the consultation document that individuals working in the private sector in job roles included under the clinical technologist "umbrella" would also have to be regulated thus private-sector employers would definitely need to comply with the requirements of regulation with respect to protected job roles. Otherwise they wouldn't be allowed to work unsupervised within NHS organisations I reckon.

However I notice that the HPC's requirements may have now changed so that it becomes more difficult for regulation of clinical technologists to take place without some evidence of suitable academic courses and suitable training being in place and evidence provided by VRCT. This means an accredited degree for new entrants, appropriate training and a defined career path including CPD is likely if regulation is to take place.

Obviously this would be awkward for employers that don't want the overhead, in terms of organisation and costs, or employees who can't, or don't want to meet, the minimum requirements of inclusion in the VRCT. Once the HPC takes over whether you're in the private or public sector it won't matter as long as your working in a protected job role and being regulated, i.e. registered. Is my interpretation way off mark I wonder?

Back in the real world I wonder whether VRCT will actually be able to meet the HPC requirements - I'm not certain if the courses are out there at the appropriate academic level to suit the HPC. Personally I hope the HPC accepts Diploma level (L3/L4?) qualifications like they do for ODPs. This may give some hope to those who don't quite meet the academic requirements at the moment who don't want to study for a degree.

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 464
Sage
Offline
Sage
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 464

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Let's not confuse the issue here - the actual DoH consultation is:

The regulation of the non-medical healthcare professions

Reading it there are statements that make it clear what the future requirements are likely to be according to the DoH.

The HPC's response is:

HPC response to consultation on regulation of the non-medical healthcare professionals

How regulation will be achieved is just one of many practicalities that will need to be sorted out.

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 578
Likes: 1
Philosopher
Offline
Philosopher
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 578
Likes: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr R J Ling:
How regulation will be achieved is just one of many practicalities that will need to be sorted out. However, if the commitment to regulate is sincere, then it's coming.
It might be coming but it seems to be still far off. Looking at the document it seems that there still is a lot of work to be done before registration could actually be put in place.

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I don't think individuals or non-NHS employers should rely on regulation being "kicked into touch" nor worry too much about who facilitates entry onto registers, e.g. IPEM/IET. It's the requirements laid down by the regulator that are most important and how regulation is actually implemented. The DoH/NHS is a massive stakeholder and commissions a lot of work involving the public and private healthcare sector - my point is that the organisation seems pretty keen on regulation.

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 75
Adept
Offline
Adept
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 75
If you have any doubts about how seriously the Department of Health views this issue please follow the link below to access the IET.TV website. It comprises the presentation given at the IET Annual Healthcare Technologies Lecture by the Chief Scientific Officer, Professor Sue Hill, on Engineering Careers in the Modern Health Service. It is a very interesting and revealing lecture which more than confirms Richard's point regarding the Department of Health's intent in relation to the education, training and regulation of the engineering professions working in healthcare.

IET.TV Webpage

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I have no doubts Jim - this one has run and run for a long time.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
Newbie
Offline
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
Thanks for the link Jim, however it would have been better If I had not to start up Microsift Windows just to see it. It is about time organisations remembered that not veryone uses the windows or even the latest version

Steve

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
Newbie
Offline
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
I am not joining IPEM. I don't want my engineerng qualifications and my medical equipment experience to be devaluated as VRCT.


Rashidi
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  DaveC in Oz, RoJo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
1 members (daisizhou), 1,673 guests, and 55 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Mark B, Royal, davidarhui, Czr, Jimmy Li
10,391 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics11,278
Posts74,590
Members10,391
Most Online69,877
Jul 17th, 2026
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5