Home Articles Downloads Forum Products Services EBME Expo Contact
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 38
Likes: 9
GlynEd Offline OP
Visionary
OP Offline
Visionary
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 38
Likes: 9
Has anybody ever produced a policy around medical equipment that uses water - specifically the cleaning of it, repair processes and acquiring new equipment?

Does anybody keep a separate list of equipment that uses water or highlight it in some way on their database?

It's not something I've ever done but from an infection control point of view is looking like a requirement.

If anybody has already been down this road I would appreciate the sharing of your knowledge.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71
Here's a start:- HTM 04-01 (A) and HTM 04-01 (B).


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 61
Likes: 6
Scholar
Offline
Scholar
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 61
Likes: 6
Hi Glyn....i am very interested in this thread as i have recently asked for there to be a separate field on our database to identify kit that uses water. i have to present to the water audit team yearly on things such as incubators ,pressure infusors, humidifiers, under warmers etc even though the water side of these are usually dealt with by the clinical side. I was asked the question, do we include things such as the RO unit? Do you include these? thanks in advance for any comments

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71
If you have control of your own database (which may be a bit of an assumption in some cases) then the addition of a single field (especially a simple logical yes/no flag) should be straightforward. But ... will that be enough?

If sensible use is to be made of the data, then surely more statements shall be required. For instance (and off the top of my head):-

1) Uses water internally (eg:- neonatal incubators, humidifiers).
2) Connected to cold water supply.
3) ditto hot water.
4) ditto treated water.
5) Drain considerations.

Surely it is better to look at the water issue from the "other end": asking the question "do your PM procedures take into account tasks such as":-

1) Cleanliness of water containers (cleaning out humidifiers etc.)
2) Cleaning filters.
3) Regular checks of water quality ... surely an "Estates" task?

Also, don't forget the various items in the clinical labs: water baths, and stills, come to mind.

PS: does your database make similar provision for PMG ... O2, MA4, Vac etc.? What about Steam, LPG and what-have-you? Again, what about "Estates" (or, if you like, "Facilities Engineering")? Or have "demarcation wars" now become a thing of the past?


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,798
Likes: 71
Originally Posted by carl ray
... do we include things such as the RO unit?
A good question. Are you thinking about dialysis units? Again, doesn't Estates take care of the water treatment side of things there?

As an aside, I have been in places (overseas, long ago) where us biomeds looked after the water treatment side of things as well as the dialysis machines themselves. I must say I preferred that, as at least we (that is, I) knew things were being looked after properly. Hopefully things are a bit different in the UK.


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.

Moderated by  DaveC in Oz, RoJo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 16,506 guests, and 35 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Chris 11, j9_PLC, nece, Vitya, Shenzhen007
10,358 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics11,249
Posts74,482
Members10,358
Most Online59,530
Apr 30th, 2026
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5