Home Articles Downloads Forum Products Services EBME Expo Contact
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,813
Likes: 72
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,813
Likes: 72
The "location based" approach is a useful one. You can balance the total PM man-hours required literally across the calendar so that (for example) the Clinical Laboratories (almost always the largest numbers of items) is scheduled for (say) the months of April and October (assuming a 6-monthly PM interval) ... or April or October if you can only manage an annual cycle.

All other user departments are slotted in across the calendar on a similar basis. Some months could see two or three departments cleared, with the aim of a similar number of man-hours assigned for each month (in other words:- a balanced programme).

When such a scheme is adopted there is no need to worry about "30-day windows"; just send the blokes to the department(s) due each month and have them go through the whole lot.

Such is a practical method, and one that I have used a number of times in the past. It was a simple system, and the blokes understood it well enough (which always helps). All everyone had to do was look at the calendar and then get on with it. The user departments also knew when to look forward to the undoubted joy of our blokes descending upon them.

Of course there were (are) always items needing special attention outside of the calendar-based programme (ventilators and so forth) but the ideas outlined were implemented with success at places where hitherto they had been running maintenance - actually repairs only - simply on an "as required" basis (that is:- no organised PM at all). In fact I had been sent to those places expressly to "get the PM moving" (as it was a contractual requirement - and financial penalties were being rumoured). It was a start; and you have to start somewhere.


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Alf #78196 19/12/24 4:23 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 18
Hero
OP Offline
Hero
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 18
Hi Alf,

Would you be able to run this past CQC and explain why the PPM dates have expired and that there is no documentation to certify that low class equipment can be used with an expired PPM date?

Last edited by Neil Porter; 19/12/24 4:34 PM.

I am not Flippant, I am Smart
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  DaveC in Oz, RoJo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
2 members (daisizhou, John Sandham), 874 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Meddeb karim, AndySkippy, happyvet, Abdulaziz abed, Fernando Henz
10,376 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics11,267
Posts74,559
Members10,376
Most Online59,530
Apr 30th, 2026
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5