Planned maintenance could be categorised in the following 3 areas:
1. High risk device
2. Medium risk devices
3. Low risk devices
Risk categorisation could be determined by:
 looking at clinical usage
 reliability
 dangers to patient on failure
 User training
A Risk centred common sense approach allows better use of resources.
High risk
These device are life saving / threatening. [e.g. Defibrillators, Infusion pumps]
All high risk devices will be checked regularly for safety and funtionality, technicians will receive technical training of a suitable standard.
Medium risk
These devices aid diagnosis and therapy [e.g. ECG, Physiotherapy]
Some medium risk devices may be maintained
Low risk
These devices aid diagnosis [e.g. Handheld Aurascope, Aneroid sphygmomanometer]
PPMs on high risk devices should be carried out more frequently than PPMs on Medium risk devices.
PPMs on Low risk devices may not carried out if the risk is deemed to be acceptably low.
We are already using this system to manage our ppm list. What is the concensus? (I know the MDA ONLY recommend following manufacturers advice) How do you manage your ppm's?
If PPMs cannot be carried out for any reason, should the EBME Manager use his experience and professionalism in deciding which PPMs are considered necessary?
