John, its a public holiday where Louis dwells, cool Louis will e-mail you our full "equipment classification policy" when Louis's Gluteus is firmly back at his desk. wink

Meantime I believe it was tailoured around the The C.E. Medical Devices Directive guidelines:-

Quote:
Classification

The directive applies different administrative requirements to devices depending on the risk which they present to the user. There are four classifications:

Class I - generally regarded as low risk
Class IIa - generally regarded as medium risk
Class IIb - generally regarded as medium risk
Class III - generally regarded as high risk.

Once it has been decided that a device falls within the scope of the Medical Devices Directive, the actual classification of an appliance is determined by a series of rules which are laid out in annex IV to the Directive. Essentially these start by saying that anything which is not covered by one of the other rules is a class I device, and then go on to give more detailed rules for the classification of other equipment. Typical factors upon which the rules decide are whether the device is intended for long term or short term use, whether it involves the use of associated pharmaceuticals and chemicals, whether it is invasive in normal bodily orifices or via surgical insertion, and whether it operates by the exchange of energy with the body. Definitions of terms used to describe these factors are also included in the annex.
You could contact cemark@conformance.co.uk for an extensive listing or use the following:-


CE Conformance.
Great Hucklow
Buxton
Derbyshire
SK17 8RG
England
Tel: +44 (0)1298 873800

It works really well for Louis's institution and combined together with a risk assesment policy it is the "dogs b*lloc#s" in terms of "labour shortage" with regards to gluteus habiliment wink

Kind Regards

Louis III cool


No trees were harmed in the posting of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
كيف الآن يحمّر البقرة