Home Articles Downloads Forum Products Services EBME Expo Contact
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 20
Novice
Offline
Novice
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 20
16 years ago I worked in sales, and visited every major DGH in England, Scotland and Wales. Whilst I may no longer be as well travelled, I have seen major improvements in infrastructure and technology.

It is true that the level of care we can now give our patients is significantly higher than it was 16 years ago, for example, just look at the number of CT/MRI scanners now available compared to 1990, modern drugs ,our capabilities with transplants, keyhole surgery meaning short/no stay operations, air-ambulances (yes I know the majority are funded by charitable donations), fast response paramedics etc.

But we must recognise that the NHS is now facing major new challenges - public expectations are now higher than they have ever been and with technological advances - they expect every little advance to be available to them, lifespans are increasing meaning there are more eldery requiring care (joint replacements, personal care, cancers have had time to develop), a litigatious society willing to screw you for the slightest mistake, drug resistant infections, a highly aggressive media to name but a few.

Some of the old problems are still there - high workloads, lack of end-of-life plans for routine equipment leading to frequent breakdowns, the unpleasant patient/visitor, lack of adequate space/resources.

I may not agree with some of the decisions made by senior management or politicians, but the NHS is now significantly different from when it was founded. The NHS is not perfect, and probably never will be, but that doesn't mean it is not staffed by dedicated, highly skilled individuals doing their best with limited resources.

Comeon guys and gals ... lets pull together and make this ship float - not sink!

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 32
Hero
Offline
Hero
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 32
Rob, Les,
I work mainly at Princess Alexandra Hospital in Harlow, I have also worked for the staffordshire procurement hub, Beford NHS Trust, Hillingdon NHS Trust, Chase Farm Hospital, Barnet NHS Trust, etc, etc. I get around in a senior management role. My perception is that the NHS is improving based on real facts. Emotion does not need to come into it. Most of the people i meet are dedicated to providing quality services for patient care and we should all take that approach. I am proud of the NHS - It is good - and improving. There is plenty of evidence to show that to be true. If anyone feels that they are not proud to work for the NHS, they should work elsewhere. In my opinion.....

John.


Be Proactive and reactive.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,664
Likes: 62
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,664
Likes: 62
My goodness, you worked in some good ones there, Mate! Although it might be looking rosy from where you stand, John, things might not be so wonderful down in the trenches these days. Probably varies a bit from location to location, though, I would have to admit. smile


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 193
Mentor
Offline
Mentor
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 193
Quote:
The NHS is not perfect, and probably never will be, but that doesn't mean it is not staffed by dedicated, highly skilled individuals doing their best with limited resources.
Comeon guys and gals ... lets pull together and make this ship float - not sink!
Too right David, however when you have been in the profession as long as I, you become a little dossillusioned by the (apparent signs of progress) when you witness firsthanded the extreme amounts of unnecessary wastage "In the name of progress"
Admittedly, staff will continue to do what they can with the limited resources.
However, what do you do when you have ABSOLUTELY NO RESOURCES at your dissposal, you become a little bitter when the rug is taken from underneath your feet.
I agree, all NHS staff should pull together, and I have no doubt that they do under most circumstances, but if the iceberg has already been hit, no amount of effort will result in the ship continuing to sail! mad


Ours is not to reason why?,
Simply obey & then comply !
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,664
Likes: 62
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,664
Likes: 62
Come on, me hearties - we may not be able to direct the wind, but we can trim the sails! smile


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 193
Mentor
Offline
Mentor
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 193
Quote:
we may not be able to direct the wind,
but we are able to stop eating eggs & beans for brekfast? laugh


Ours is not to reason why?,
Simply obey & then comply !
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 768
Philosopher
Offline
Philosopher
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 768
Has the NHS improved? Almost certainly with regard to technological advances with regard to patient treatment.
But has it ipmproved with regard to efficiency? Very debatable.
The government has increased the funding available for the NHS, but has appointed more managers to oversee the allocation and use of resources than you can shake a stick at. Is this an efficient use of resources?
If the NHS was run in the same way that a company is, would there be major changes?
I think that each employee of the NHS should be asked the question "does your job directly contribute to patient care?" If not can they justify their job?


Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,664
Likes: 62
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,664
Likes: 62
Back on topic? Yes, but beggars can’t be choosers in NHS hospital restaurants (should that be canteens?) … especially true at your location I would have to say, Chris! smile


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 32
Hero
Offline
Hero
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 32
Resources are always an issue and EBME departments seem to be at the back of the queue when they are being dished out.

Getting resources allocated is difficult but not impossible. If you can clearly present your proposal showing benefits versus investment the decision is normally 'for' investment. If the decision is 'against' maybe the decision is not going to the right management forum/level in the organisation.

It is frustrating and slow to change - a bit like trying to turn an oil tanker around quickly. It is impossible to turn it around quickly, but it can be turned around. It took me a long time to get the resources I needed for our EBME dept, but we got what we wanted eventually - The slow transformation and investment was very annoying for the staff having to work under tremendous pressure and sometimes wondering if anything would improve, but it has.


Be Proactive and reactive.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,664
Likes: 62
Super Hero
Offline
Super Hero
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 14,664
Likes: 62
Here's some good news (?). Makes me wonder why guys on this forum keep on about cutting costs, whilst this sort of thing still goes on! frown


If you don't inspect ... don't expect.
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  DaveC in Oz, RoJo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
1 members (daisizhou), 426 guests, and 37 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Yousri, mosfet1996, rajvenugopal, Arzo Momand, steve_shomz
10,180 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums25
Topics11,064
Posts73,741
Members10,180
Most Online5,980
Jan 29th, 2020
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5