I say "should" because it seems that afc has failed to ensure that equal jobs around the country, or even within one hospital, are banded equally. And of course, not all jobs are subject to afc - such as all medical posts, and senior management posts with what appear to be negotiable salaries and bonuses. Why is afc considered to be the best way of deciding salary for some people but not others?
Originally Posted By: Neil Porter
Panander, I notice that your response on this thread contains a lot of 'should' does that mean that there is no definitive answer, especially as you are also advising another route for a career within the NHS.
